European Commission Fifth RTD Framework Programme

A Future for The Dead Sea: Options for a More Sustainable Water Management

 The Project Threats  Results Consortium  Team Links   BACK To MAIN PAGE

 
Search the Website
The Project
 

Introduction

Objectives

Approach

Methods & Building Blocks

Water Uses

Threats

Factors

Preliminary Results

 

Physiography & Climate

Surface Water

Groundwater

Water Imports/Exports

Water Uses

Wastewater

Peoples' Attitudes and Perceptions

Biodiversity

Land Use and Land Cover

Data and maps


Population Distribution

Surface Water Harvesting

Groundwater Wells and Springs

Water Uses

Land use/cover Change

Biomass Change (1985-2004)

Water Balance Sheet

What's new

News

Publications and reports

Question of the Week

Focus Group Meetings

Scenario Management Tool

Dynamic Synthesis Model

Essential Needs of Nature

Proposal for Interdisciplinary Research Integration

        Agricultural Landscape in         West-northern Dead Sea coast


Water Uses


Water Uses
   
   
   


Uses of Water in the Dead Sea Basin

Israel

 

       Israel institutes a centralized form of water management. All water resources are the property of the state and water distribution, allocation and pricing are governed by the national water company, Mekorot, in conjunction with a government appointed water commissioner. Over 60% of the state’s water goes to agriculture where the water is highly subsidized (Table 1). In fact, this favoritism toward agriculture has lead to the mismanagement of the state’s water resources as can be seen in the over-exploitation of the country’s water resources, primarily groundwater.

Table 1: Water Prices in Israel for 2003 (Source: Israel Water Commission)

Use of Water                                                     Price Per Cubic Meter in Shekels (NIS)

Agricultural use                                                    

    High-quality water                                          

        Up to 50% of the user’s allotment                                  0.691

        Next 30% of user’s allotment                                                    0.833

        Remainder of the allotment                                                       1.118

 Average                                                                                        0.818

        Runoff or water with high salinity  Levels                             0.606

        Recycled effluent                                                                          0.488

        Household Use (average Mekorot  price)                        1.374

Industrial Use                                                                                     1.330

        Prices charged to Municipalities            

        Hotels                                                                                              1.160

        Gardening in public areas                                                         2.540

        Other urban uses                                                                         4.130

Residential use Average                                                               3.460

NIS (Israel New Shekel): 1 NIS= 0,194 Euro, Bank of Israel 14.5.2003

 

      In the study area, the decline of the Dead Sea is directly correlated with the diversion of water in the upper Jordan watershed. The National Water Carrier, that diverts water from the Sea of Galilee to provide irrigation and municipal water to most parts of the country has caused the Jordan River to practically cease to flow; the result is a declining Dead Sea.

 

      Tourism, agriculture and industry are the most important economic sectors when it comes to water use in the study area. Most of the water is expropriated from groundwater and springs, that left untapped, would flow into the Dead Sea.  Figure 1 describes the water consumption for agriculture in the two regional authorities in the study area. The first, the Tamar Regional Authority is located within pre-1967 Israel, the second; Megillot Regional Authority is located within post-1967 Israel. Table 2 describes the domestic water allocated to both regional authorities by Mekorot. 

 

                     

       Figure 1:  Water consumption in irrigation (Tamar and Megilot regions)

 

 

 

Table 2: Domestic water allocated to the regional authorities in Israel

 

Regional Authority

Community

Annual water allocation (cubic meters)

Megillot

Vered Jericho

1,200,000

 

Kibuz Almog

800,000

 

Beit Ha'arava

750,000

 

Kibuz Kalya

1,500,000

Subtotal

 

4,250,000

Tamar

Myzpe Shalem

400,000

 

Kibuz Ein-Gedi

1,500,000

 

Neot-Hakikar

2,500,000

 

Ein-Tamar

1,600,000

Subtotal

 

6,000,000

Total

 

10,250,000

     

 

        Most of the wells in the study area that are owned and operated by Mekorot are of drinking water quality but are used primarily for irrigation. The Dead Sea Works, by the far the largest industry in the region and the largest consumer of water in the region, is one of the few private entities in Israel that owns and operates its own water resources. To date, the company has been unwilling to share its data with the public but as a proxy for water consumption by the company we have used the capacity of water reservoirs that are operated by the company which amounts to 5,400,000 cubic meters.

 

arrowblue.gif (273 Byte) Top

 

Jordan

 

      Most of all available water in the area is used for irrigation of agricultural crops. This, however, generates only limited economic benefit. The agricultural sector uses about 65-70 % of water, but it contributes only about 4 %  to employment, and only 2 % to GDP.  In comparison, the industrial sector contributes 22 % to employment and 13.3 % to GDP.

 

       Every cubic meter of water consumed in the agricultural sector results in export revenues of 0.27 Jordanian Dinars (JD) per m3, compared to 122 JD/m3 for industries. In other words, water is approximately 145 times more productive in industry than it is in agriculture.

 

arrowblue.gif (273 Byte) Top

 

 

Palestine

 

        Water resources in the Dead Sea Basin consist primarily of surface and ground water resources. However, due to the political situation, Palestinians have little access to these resources.  Water demands are partially met by groundwater abstractions and by purchasing water from the Israeli "Mekorot" Water Company (Table 3).

 

Table 3:Ground water resources and water supply for Palestinian Communities in the Dead Sea area (Source: PWA, 2002). Numbers given in million cubic meters (MCM) per year.

 

 

From
Springs

From
IL-controlled Mekorot
Wells

From
PS-controlled PWA/Private Wells

From
IL-controlled (Mekorot) Wells Outside

Total
Use

 

*Q1

**Q2

***Q3

Q1

Q1

Q2

Q1

 

Munic/Ind Use

-

-

-

2.60

9.17

-

3.19

14.96

Agric Use

12.55

0.55

-

-

3.34

1.86

-

18.30

All Usage Sectors

5.55

-

-

-

-

-

-

5.55

Not Usable

-

0.04

59.99

-

-

-

-

60.03

Total

18.10

0.59

59.99

2.60

12.51

1.86

3.19 

98.84

Water quality index:
           *Q1: Drinking water
           ** Q2: Water usable for agricultural irrigation
           *** Q3: Brackish water, not usable without prior treatment

Note: Numbers do not include Mekorot wells supplying the IL Settlement.

 

 

        It should be noted, however, that actual water demand is much higher than actual water supply (Table 4).  About 55 % of water (i.e. 21.3 MCM/yr from groundwater and 0.7 MCM/yr from surface water) is allocated to the agricultural sector (Figure 2). The total area of Palestinian irrigated agriculture is approximately 20,780 dunums (about 2100 hectares), most of it in and around Jericho city. The contribution of the agricultural sector to Palestinian GDP is about 8 % (2001 data).

 

 

Table  4: Agricultural, municipal and industrial water demand for the Palestinian population in the Dead Sea Basin with 38% physical loss in water supply (current value), with the physical   loss reduced to 20% and with the physical loss reduced to 10%. Domestic water demand was based on the minimum fresh water requirements  of 100 l/c/d as set by the World Health Organization.   All numbers given in million cubic meters (MCM) per year.

 

Demand (MCM/yr) 2002 2005 2010 2015   2020
Municipal/industrial demand (38% physical loss) 30.16 33.92 41.27 50.21 61.09
Municipal/industrial demand (20% physical loss) 23.37 26.29 31.98 38.91 47.35
Municipal/industrial demand (10% physical loss) 20.77 23.37 28.43 34.59 42.08
Agricultural demand 23.56 26.51 32.25 39.23 47.73

 

 

                            

Figure 2: A tomato field in Jericho City / April 2004

 

        The total municipal water allocation for Palestinian communities in the study area is about 16.95 MCM/yr, of which the tourism sector had received 0.16 MCM, the livestock economy 1.75 MCM, public use 0.9 MCM, and domestic use (drinking water, hygiene, etc) 14.3 MCM.

 

 

arrowblue.gif (273 Byte) Top


Links


POLAGWAT/ A Relevant Project